Recently, I was featured on GigaOM, discussing the pros and cons of in-house data center ownership for public cloud infrastructure-as-a-service providers. With the widespread media attention dedicated to recent outages, including Amazon’s latest downtime, it’s evident that maintaining consistent data center uptime can be a real challenge. So, the question remains, are IaaS providers equipped to deliver resilient data center facilities in addition to their public cloud infrastructure offerings?
At a high level, the article describes that, while there are certain advantages for cloud providers operating data centers in-house, including greater control, capacity, power and security, the challenges, such as geographic expansion, connectivity, location, cost and lower-tier facilities often outweigh the benefits.
Ultimately, running a data center is nothing like running a cloud and can actually be a big distraction from IaaS providers’ core competency. With everything from security and redundancy to power and cooling required to be operating at peak performance, running a data center is a complicated, full-time job. By focusing on the cloud and not the data center, public cloud IaaS providers don’t need to make tradeoffs between investing in the data center over the cloud, thereby ensuring the cloud is continually operating at maximum capacity and performance with the best resources available.
The full article may be viewed at http://gigaom.com/cloud/baillie-public-iaas, and I’d be interested in hearing what you think on the matter. Should public IaaS cloud providers run their own data centers or have the benefits of using a third party data center provider outweighed the drawbacks? If you have any thoughts on the subject, please feel free to leave them in the comments section below.